{"content":{"sharePage":{"page":0,"digests":[{"id":"7254731","dateCreated":"1227369559","smartDate":"Nov 22, 2008","userCreated":{"username":"scheesec","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/scheesec","imageUrl":"https:\/\/ssl.wikicdn.com\/i\/user_none_lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/researchdesign.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/7254731"},"dateDigested":1532389468,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"ORDER DISCREPANCY II","description":"THE BEST SEQUENCING SEEMS TO ME TO BE THE ORDER IN WHICH THEY ARE LISTED ON THE BOTTOM OF THE HOME PAGE.  THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTS THEM IN A DIFFERENT ORDER WHICH IS CONFUSING.<br \/>\n<br \/>\nIF EVALUATING IS, INDEED, AS IT SAYS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE HOME PAGE--EVALUATING WHAT YOU HAVE WRITTEN SO FAR AND DETERMINING IF YOU NEED TO LOCATE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION--THEN IT SHOULD LOGICALLY FOLLOW &quot;SYNTHESIS&quot; SINCE YOU CAN NOT EVALUATE WHAT YOU HAVEN'T YET WRITTEN.  <br \/>\n<br \/>\nTHE INFORMATION ON THE EVALUATION OF SOURCES FOR AUTHENTICITY AND RELIABILITY IS MORE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED ON THE &quot;GATHERING&quot; PAGE.","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]},{"id":"6786655","dateCreated":"1226055042","smartDate":"Nov 7, 2008","userCreated":{"username":"scheesec","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/scheesec","imageUrl":"https:\/\/ssl.wikicdn.com\/i\/user_none_lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/researchdesign.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/6786655"},"dateDigested":1532389468,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"Order discrepancy","description":"The order of the individual elements on the graphic is in a different order than they are listed in the text that follows.  While it isn't necessarily a linear process--there is a back-and-forth aspect--there are definitely steps that must precede the others.","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]},{"id":"6111985","dateCreated":"1223923084","smartDate":"Oct 13, 2008","userCreated":{"username":"scheesec","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/scheesec","imageUrl":"https:\/\/ssl.wikicdn.com\/i\/user_none_lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/researchdesign.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/6111985"},"dateDigested":1532389468,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"In-service revisions","description":"We really only got started on evaluating the research wiki since no one had seen your e-mail over the weekend about being invited to the wiki.  For many, this was their first time seeing it.  By the time we got to this portion of the agenda, we had only about 30 minutes or so to do the work.  <br \/>\n<br \/>\nMost said that they need more time to evaluate it and make suggestions.  Almost all of those working on it felt that we need clearer, more specific directions in place for the students to follow before they are offered the rationale or the various choices to accomplish the task.  In other words, clearly spell out the steps of the task at each juncture before asking them to decide on a mode to accomplish it.","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]}],"more":false},"comments":[]},"http":{"code":200,"status":"OK"},"redirectUrl":null,"javascript":null,"notices":{"warning":[],"error":[],"info":[],"success":[]}}